Gloves and Hand Protection

Credit: Thinkstock In equine veterinary care, gloves spare humans from exposure to harmful organisms, toxins, and pharmaceuticals such as progesterone analogs and other hormone products, topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral sedatives, and antimicrobial drugs like chloramphenicol.

Human skin is the primary barrier against microbes, toxins and physical injury. In equine veterinary care, gloves spare humans from exposure to harmful organisms, toxins, and pharmaceuticals such as progesterone analogs and other hormone products, topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral sedatives, and antimicrobial drugs like chloramphenicol.

In 1994, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published personal protective equipment standards (29 Code of Federal Regulations) to regulate workplace protection with a focus on respiratory protection. Hand protection and workplace clothing have been the subjects of minimal regulation.

Disposable gloves are made of different materials with different levels of protection. The typical rectal palpation glove prevents skin contact with feces, but does not protect against substances such as bleach. A latex glove keeps hands clean when dealing with body fluids, but provides little skin protection against chemicals.

Glove protection has several measures. Penetration refers to punctures or tears in the glove. Permeation describes the ability of a substance to pass through an intact glove without damaging the glove material. Permeation is measured by breakthrough time (BTT). Degradation indicates alteration of the physical properties of the glove material upon exposure to chemicals.

Each glove manufacturer produces a glove selection chart to describe its products’ protection against specific compounds and solvents. Manufacturers of chemicals (including pharmaceuticals) have a Safety Data Sheet (previously known as Material Safety Data Sheets) that lists personal protective equipment (including recommended glove type) as well as other valuable information. However, for some chemicals, the gloves for hand protection are simply listed as “impervious” in which case, basic knowledge about glove types is critical.

Skin exposure occurs before there is a perception of leakage through a glove. Measures of permeation and degradation vary considerably between glove manufacturers. More importantly, the reported protection often does not reflect the true protection in the field. Wide variations in BTT occur due to variations between batches, effects of ambient temperature and humidity, and hand motion. Hand motion alone has been reported to significantly alter BTT.

Disposable glove choices are generally limited to latex, nitrile, or vinyl. Each glove has its own attributes. Latex has a smooth fit, offers good dexterity, and protects from bodily fluids and pathogens. However the material can cause allergic reactions, degrades readily from exposure to chemicals and disinfectants, and punctures can be inapparent.

Nitrile is a synthetic polymer so there is less allergic stimulation and it is puncture resistant. Tears are easily seen. The fit is good, which reduces hand fatigue and snags. Nitrile has good resistance to both chemicals and to microbes.Vinyl gloves are commonly used in the food industry and offer the least protection against many chemicals. The glove is not affected by movement, but can be a poor fit.

Rubber or neoprene gloves are recommended when using many disinfectants as these chemicals can be caustic and irritating to skin.

No one glove material is resistant to all different chemicals. Disposable gloves are meant to be discarded and not reused. Read the package insert of any chemical, pharmaceutical, pesticide, or disinfectant for information on personal protective equipment, including specific glove recommendations.

This article was written by Dr. Rachel Westerlund of the Maryland Equine Center. You may contact her at rachelwesterlund@gmail.com.

This article is from the Equine Disease Quarterly, published by the University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Department of Veterinary Science and sponsored by Lloyd’s of London and its Kentucky agents. You may subscribe to this publication for free.

categories
tags
Trending Articles
Wisconsin-2-Counties
3 Wisconsin Horses Positive for EHV
ProvidenceCounty-RI-Wiki
Rhode Island Quarter Horse Positive for EHV-4
madigan-foal-compression-1-min
Madigan Foal Squeeze Technique
Michigan-3-Counties-1
4 Michigan Horses Positive for Strangles
Newsletter
Get the best from EquiManagement delivered straight to your inbox once a week! Topics include horse care, disease alerts, and vet practitioner updates.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Country*

Additional Offers

Untitled
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.