The Legal and Ethical Implications of the VCPR 

State and federal laws concerning VCPR differ and change frequently, and ethics sometimes conflict with legal requirements.
Veterinarian examining a horse and talking with an owner to establish VCPR.
Some states require a physical examination every 12 months to maintain VCPR. | Getty Images

At the 2025 American Association of Equine Practitioners Convention in Denver, Barb Crabbe, DVM, described the importance of the Veterinary Client Patient Relationship in maintaining ethical standards and meeting legal requirements. The VCPR is a fundamental relationship that is central to decision-making for veterinarians, she said, warning that state and federal laws concerning VCPR differ and change frequently. And, unfortunately, ethics and VCPR requirements sometimes conflict, Crabbe noted.  

“What is ethical isn’t always legal, and what is legal isn’t always ethical,” she said. 

The American Veterinary Medicine Association defines a VCPR as a professional relationship where the veterinarian has assumed responsibility for providing care and the client has agreed to follow the veterinarian’s instructions; there is a timely in-person examination of the animal or a visit to the herd; and the veterinarian is readily available for follow-up and emergency care or has made arrangement for such care to be provided. Many states are changing their rules to allow a virtual VCPR that removes the requirement for an in-person exam, Crabbe added.  

In theory, ethical duties should supersede legal requirements, she said. When existing laws conflict with the ethical practice of veterinary medicine, Crabbe advised veterinarians to advocate for change of those laws so they can continue to practice both legally and ethically. 

She provided an example of a veterinarian practicing in a state that requires a physical examination every 12 months to maintain VCPR. What if a patient urgently needs a prescription refill to avoid serious health complications but hasn’t had an exam in 14 months? 

“Although a veterinarian who makes an ethical decision based on what they believe is best for the patient is unlikely to face significant legal repercussions in the majority of situations, these types of dilemmas leaveveterinarians vulnerable to legal challenges and can contribute to professional stress,” she said.  

Crabbe recommended veterinarians understand current state and federal laws surrounding VCPR, recognize when ethical care conflicts with legal limits, and push for changes to the law when needed. 

Business coverage from the 2025 AAEP Convention is brought to you by CareCredit.

Stay in the know! Sign up for EquiManagement’s FREE weekly newsletters to get the latest equine research, disease alerts, and vet practice updates delivered straight to your inbox.

categories
tags
Trending Articles
[Aggregator] Downloaded image for imported item #18711
2 Arizona Horses Test Positive for EHV-1
Horse racing action
Pentosan Polysulfate: An Evidence-Based Option for Managing Equine Osteoarthritis 
Tierärztin im Einsatz
Golden Rules for Removing Equine Skin Tumors
Honey Before After
Daily Vet Life: Managing and Feeding Starved Horses 
Newsletter
Get the best from EquiManagement delivered straight to your inbox once a week! Topics include horse care, disease alerts, and vet practitioner updates.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Country*

Additional Offers

Untitled
EquiManagement
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.